Mapping Brad Pitt’s Filmography onto the 20-Node MTP Framework

Category:
AI & Technology, Personal Reflections
Published:
September 7, 2025 7:06 PM JST

This image reflects the tone and underlying structure of the article.

The following is an experimental application of the Mapping the Prompt (MTP) framework to classify films from Brad Pitt’s career.

Introduction

In a clean ChatGPT session (GPT-5, no memory or personalization), I asked:

Does Brad Pitt have more than 20 well-known, critically acclaimed films as a lead or major actor?

ChatGPT replied:

Brad Pitt has more than 20 films where he played a leading or major role and which are considered well-known or critically acclaimed. Here are some examples:

  • 1990s
    • A River Runs Through It (1992)
    • Legends of the Fall (1994)
    • Se7en (1995)
    • 12 Monkeys (1995)
    • The Devil’s Own (1997)
    • Fight Club (1999)
  • 2000s
    • Snatch (2000)
    • Ocean’s Eleven (2001) (+ sequels)
    • Troy (2004)
    • Mr. & Mrs. Smith (2005)
    • The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (2008)
    • Inglourious Basterds (2009)
  • 2010s and later
    • Moneyball (2011)
    • World War Z (2013)
    • Fury (2014)
    • Ad Astra (2019)
    • Once Upon a Time in Hollywood (2019) [Oscar win]

What Is Mapping the Prompt (MTP)?

I then introduced the Mapping the Prompt (MTP) concept to ChatGPT.
MTP is a 20-node narrative framework that allows prompts, ideas, or media to be mapped as arcs of emergence → structure → breakdown.

🔗 GitHub – MTP – Concept ↗


ChatGPT’s Initial Mapping

ChatGPT classified the 20+ Brad Pitt films into the MTP framework as follows:

#NodeYearMovie TitleReason
1Start1992A River Runs Through ItEarly leading role, youth and nature.
2Open1994Legends of the FallExpansive family saga.
3Power1995Se7enExplosive intensity and psychological darkness.
4Return2001Ocean’s ElevenRepeating joy of teamwork, clever fun.
5Grow1997Seven Years in TibetSpiritual and cultural growth.
6Helix2008Benjamin ButtonTime reversal and life spiral.
7Focus2011MoneyballStrategic precision and intellect.
8Enter2005Mr. & Mrs. SmithDual life of espionage and marriage.
9Flow2014FuryWar as a flowing current of death and duty.
10Close2004TroyHeroic myth closing an epic.
11Still1998Meet Joe BlackQuiet existential contemplation.
12Void2019Ad AstraCosmic emptiness and father-son alienation.
13Surge2009Inglourious BasterdsNarrative violence as shock therapy.
14Wither1997The Devil’s OwnFading ideals and moral ambiguity.
15Collapse2006BabelBreakdown of language and bonds.
16Haze2000SnatchComedic chaos and misdirection.
17Drift1999Fight ClubIdentity disintegration and rebellion.
18Abyss199512 MonkeysMadness and deep future dread.
19Fade2013World War ZHumanity’s slow collapse.
20End2019Once Upon a Time in HollywoodA nostalgic curtain call.

Grok’s Feedback

A Grok-based model offered analytical feedback and suggested a few replacements to improve continuity and thematic flow.

Grok’s Revised MTP Table

#NodeYearMovie TitleReason
1Start1992A River Runs Through ItYouthful entry point, nature and initiation.
2Open1994Legends of the FallExpansive emotional family saga.
3Power1995Se7enViolent intensity, dark force.
4Return2007The Assassination of Jesse James…Cyclical reflection and outlaw melancholy.
5Grow1997Seven Years in TibetInner and cultural growth.
6Helix2008The Curious Case of Benjamin ButtonCentral spiral of time.
7Focus2011MoneyballAnalytical clarity, strategic focus.
8Enter2005Mr. & Mrs. SmithDual-life immersion, entry to action.
9Flow2014FuryFlow of war and brotherhood.
10Close2011The Tree of LifeGentle philosophical closure to Side A.
11Still1998Meet Joe BlackPoised, calm presence of Death.
12Void2019Ad AstraCosmic void and parental absence.
13Surge2009Inglourious BasterdsViolent historical rupture.
14Wither1998Meet Joe BlackDeath as erosion of connection (duplicate allowed).
15Collapse2006BabelSystemic breakdown and fragmentation.
16Haze2000SnatchMulti-threaded confusion and wit.
17Drift1999Fight ClubPsychological unraveling.
18Abyss199512 MonkeysTime-loop and madness descent.
19Fade2013World War ZGlobal decline and fear.
20End2019Once Upon a Time in HollywoodCareer elegy, nostalgic curtain call.

DeepSeek’s Reinterpretation

DeepSeek provided a fresh structure with some notable differences.

DeepSeek’s MTP Table

#NodeYearMovie TitleReason
1Start1991Thelma & LouiseIconic breakout role, symbolic launch.
2Open1994Legends of the FallUnfolding fate and emotion.
3Power1995Se7enRage and violent pursuit.
4Return2001Ocean’s ElevenClever circular heist joy.
5Grow1997Seven Years in TibetSpiritual evolution.
6Helix2008The Curious Case of Benjamin ButtonTime’s paradoxical spiral.
7Focus2011MoneyballPrecision through data strategy.
8Enter2005Mr. & Mrs. SmithDynamic dual roles, life clash.
9Flow2014FuryMomentum of war and inner life.
10Close2011The Tree of LifeCosmic and familial closure.
11Still1998Meet Joe BlackDeath embodied, time suspended.
12Void2019Ad AstraLoneliness, cosmic nothingness.
13Surge2009Inglourious BasterdsShock action and rewrite of history.
14Wither2007The Assassination of Jesse James…Quiet erosion of trust.
15Collapse2006BabelDisconnection and breakdown.
16Haze2000SnatchComic blur of plots.
17Drift1999Fight ClubIdentity loss and chaos.
18Abyss199512 MonkeysInsanity, time loop dread.
19Fade2013World War ZSlow apocalypse, fading hope.
20End2019Once Upon a Time in HollywoodReflective farewell to a cinematic era.

Shared Patterns Across LLMs

Despite varied approaches, all three models shared some key instincts:

  • Helix = Benjamin Button
  • Collapse = Babel
  • End = Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
  • Void = Ad Astra

These reinforce MTP as more than a random structure — it’s a semantic and narrative topology recognizable even by divergent LLMs.


Suggestions for Refinement

  1. Highlight timeline and theme progression more visually (e.g., with a Side A / Side B separator or graph).
  2. Consider alternate tags for duplicated films (e.g., Meet Joe Black in both “Still” and “Wither”) or offer tie-breaker candidates.
  3. Compare to other character arcs for deeper contrast.

Future Use Cases (Optional Add-On Section)

  • 🎬 Map other actors or directors: e.g., Meryl Streep, Denzel Washington, Wes Anderson
  • 🎵 Apply MTP to music albums (conceptual or personal arcs)
  • 🧠 Compare MTP patterns between real and fictional personas
  • 📈 Use MTP to model user taste and preference drift over time
  • ✍️ Write screenplays or novels using MTP as a scaffolding

Conclusion

Mapping Brad Pitt’s filmography through MTP has revealed more than genre diversity — it exposed a narrative arc of a modern actor’s evolution.

Three LLMs, without access to one another’s reasoning, arrived at overlapping patterns and structure-aware decisions. This validates MTP as a tool not only for prompt design, but for cultural and emotional topology.


MTP isn’t just about prompts — it’s about mapping meaning in motion.

Search This Site